Who instructed Erisco Foods, the producers of Nagiko tomato pastes, to place this woman under arrest?
A error has been made by the company that is owned by Erisco Foods. Who is it that suggested the management of Erisco Foods, which is the company that makes the tomato paste sold under the brand name Nagiko, put this woman behind bars? It was a total and utter failure on their part, and it had the potential to cause much more harm to the company than the lady's scathing review of the things that were manufactured by the organization.
How many people back the woman who was detained as a supporter? How many people liked, shared, or commented on the post that she made? And how many individuals left unfavourable remarks on the tomato paste in response to the post that she created? Now perform the plus and minus operations, and then use the results of those operations to compare the thousands of bad comments on the tomato paste that I have read on hundreds of pages and blogs since today. Since this morning, I have been exposed to these comments.
Stories that a consumer was arrested by Erisco Foods for giving a poor review about the company's products are currently spreading like wildfire across the world of Facebook. The corporation is proceeding in the wrong direction. Some individuals are considering a boycott of the product, but not because of the rumour that there is sugar in the tomato paste; rather, they are considering it because of how sensitive they are to poor evaluations of their products. The rumour that there is sugar in the tomato paste is not the reason why some people are considering a boycott of the product. There are already people who are referring to your company as an anarchist firm that should not be supported, and they are a part of that designation.
But wait on, does this indicate that Erisco Foods does not periodically engage in public evaluation of the items that they sell? Who exactly is running that business, though? Why aren't they able to observe how it has been carried out on Google Play? On Google Play, there is a section that allows users to provide reviews for any product that is sold there. Even I have been guilty of criticizing Facebook in the past and giving it a low rating or a thumbs-down when it comes to online ratings.
Because of this lady's negative review of Erisco's products, the company would never have the opportunity to become more well-known in Nigeria than any other maker of tomato paste there is. They ought to have extended an invitation to her to tour the production facilities of the company and given her the opportunity to observe the manufacturing process of the tomato paste. They had to have brought her along with ten other persons who were not affiliated with their company so that the customers could see the production of the products and then sample the finished goods.
Who can say for certain whether or not someone, somewhere, is producing fake Nagiko tomatoes and selling them on the market? Who is to say if she bought fake Nagiko or Nagiko that had beyond its expiration date and was therefore spoiled, causing the taste to be sweet? You could have avoided arresting her by making an offer to share a sample of the product with her in front of the cameras in order to show her that Nagiko does not contain any sugar and so dissuade her from committing the crime.
Please, it is not yet too late to request that the hands of the clock be turned back. There is still time. According to what I've been told, the management of Erisco Foods is just as engaged on social media as the rest of the company. Please visit sites such as ADVERT WITH ME or SAHARA REPORTERS, amongst many others, if you want to see for yourself what other people are saying about tomatoes from the Nagiko brand. The comments in this section are overwhelmingly negative, making up 85% of the total. This is a matter of the utmost importance. Set the lady free, find a way to appease the worries of the broader audience, and look into the possibilities of making your product better.
It is of the utmost importance that this company, which has helped a significant number of students in my neighbourhood with their financial needs and which, only a few short months ago, gave out many million Nigerian naira to young people in my town, does not fail. Gragra on its own is not sufficient to explain anything. Please let the woman go, and do so regardless of whether or not you believe that she gave an intentionally low rating to the tomatoes that Nagiko had grown. Let's not put the product in further jeopardy by bringing it more harm via our actions because Nigerians are emotional people, and they are more likely to support the lady than they are Erisco items. Let's not put the product in further jeopardy by causing it more harm through our actions.